
The World Bank now estimates that for the first time since World War II, the global economy will shrink this year. The slow down that began in December 2007 in the United States has now become what the head of the International Monetary Fund is calling "The Great Recession."
American eyes are fixated on Washington where each week plans costing billions and even trillions are launched or modified. But as the L.A. Times Business section noted this morning, "The $787-billion stimulus package that President Obama signed into law is a drop in the bucket for a world economy that produces $78 trillion in goods and services each year."
That turns out to be the flip side of the bounty of globalization which kept down inflation and brought all of us access to big screen televisions. As Thomas Friedman wrote this week, "We have created a system for growth that depended on our building more and more stores to sell more and more stuff made in more and more factories in China, powered by more and more coal that would cause more and more climate change but earn China more and more dollars to buy more and more U.S. T-bills so America would have more and more money to build more and more stores and sell more and more stuff that would employ more and more Chinese … We can't do this anymore."
If Friedman is right, the economic downturn is not a cyclical event that we will "recover" from in a year or two. It is a fundamental shift away from a debt-fueled consumer economy to . . . well, it is a little early to tell.
Here in Ventura, we remain insulated from the harshest signs of the economy "falling off a cliff" as Warren Buffet observed this week. But we are deeply affected by the unfolding crisis. Today, we delivered to the City Council our "Redesign Plan" for creating a "leaner and greener organization" to deliver the results that matter most to Ventura residents. It is a two-year budget plan for operating within available resources. The plan reduces expenses by $11.4 million through reducing compensation, staff and services to the community. It puts highest priority on protecting public safety and proposes sweeping changes in the way we do business. One of the most significant changes involves looking ahead to a more sustainable model for prosperity. For too long, cities have chased sales tax dollars in fierce and expensive competition with neighboring communities. But we can't do this anymore. We need to refocus our attention to the high wage, high value jobs that generate the wealth that supports the retail sector. Ventura's Redesign Plan reorganizes and refocuses our efforts to meet the challenges of the new economy. Given the high cost of doing business in coastal California, we must take advantage of the assets we have. Last year, Fortune Small Business"scoured the country for towns that combine a great business environment with alluring leisure offerings" and put Ventura on their "Top 100 Places to Live and Launch." Can globally competitive companies thrive in this environment? Look at Patagonia, recently featured on the cover of Fortune as "The Coolest Company on the Planet." Sales last year? Nearly $300 million worldwide. Not bad for a Ventura-based company whose mission is to "Build the best product, cause no unnecessary harm, use business to inspire and implement solutions to the environmental crisis." Can their success inspire others? It already has -- including companies like Walmart and GE whose top corporate officers have made pilgrimages to the company's headquarters to learn more about their policies and practices. And it can inspire a different approach to economic development -- looking forward toward an emerging economy instead of backward at the one now in deep crisis.

7 comments:
As stated by city manager Rick Cole!
“Today, we delivered to the City Council our "Redesign Plan" for creating a "leaner and greener organization" to deliver the results that matter most to Ventura residents. It is a two-year budget plan for operating within available resources.”
As stated by Rellis Smith
With all the cuts and reduced services you are suggesting, I have yet to hear anything about removing the $500,000/yr travel and conference item, or the automobile allowances, or the practice of allowing some employees to take city vehicles home, or the free meals paid for by tax money that the council enjoys before each council meeting, or trying to end the Redflex contract that is costing us over $1,000,000 per year, or asking the 55 employees that are reaping over $100,000/yr to take a minimal 10% salary cut, or reduce staff in the city managers and city attorneys office, or trying to end the ridiculous $4,000,000 contract with the company that is failing to bring any “high tech” business’s to Ventura, from the budget.
It would appear to the novice that the only things that are being considered for “cutting” are items that won’t affect the upper echelon of the Ivory Tower.
Rick Cole said:
"One of the most significant changes involves looking ahead to a more sustainable model for prosperity. For too long, cities have chased sales tax dollars in fierce and expensive competition with neighboring communities. But we can't do this anymore. We need to refocus our attention to the high wage, high value jobs that generate the wealth that supports the retail sector."
Has he forgotten that the economy will recover, as it always has, and cities like Oxnard and Camarillo that are not frightened to death of development like Ventura will be positioned to reap the sales tax benefits from all retailers that have gone there instead of Ventura? It seems so...
Wow, you just took the words right out of every workers mouth in the corp. yard.
Cutting the fat from the top will save much more money and keep the level of service to the public where it is now instead of lowering service levels to keep upper echelon's pockets fat.
I'm always entertained by Rellis' opinions, although they frequently are unhindered by facts.
Anonymous makes a reasonable point: that the economy will "recover as it always does." I think the economy will recover, but retail will not. It is now clear that America's retail sector grew beyond the capacity of the over indebted consumer to support it. Between that change and the continued shift of retail to the web, large expansion of retail square footage is not in the cards for many years.
The charge that Ventura has not pursued retail development simply doesn't hold up. Our per capita retail sales are better than either Oxnard or Camarillo. All three cities have pumped large subsidies into retail development. But with 73,000 national retail outlets closing this year and large mall developers facing bankruptcy, continuing to put taxpayer money into promoting consumer good sales is not a wise investment.
Rellis do you have evidence to back up those statements? The burden of proof does lay with you and I would be interested in seeing it if it was true.
My concern is that there is a lot of vagueness and buzz words without much content. Can you outline what your plan is? Can you outline the cuts and make them transparent (for example make a site to post this information) and easy for everyone to see.
I believe we need to not strive for being green but sustainable. It is not something that happens over night but to get there we have to actually have the right goal to begin working on a plan. Anything else is a dead end.
Rick,
Your point is well taken that the retail sector is changing due to web-based sales and other evolutions that are occurring in the marketplace. I also tend to agree with your point on the over-indebtedness of consumers and how this will affect consumer spending habits into the future.
However, I think the shift may well be to more discount retailers, like Wal-Mart, Costco, and others that cater more to the cash and carry crowd. I disagree that economic development efforts focusing on retail development aren't a good investment for local governments.
I think it will most assuredly require a shift in thinking on the types of retailers to pursue, but when the economy rebounds there will definitely be a void awaiting to be filled.
I appreciate Unheard Voice's comments. For all the details of the "Redesign Proposal" that prioritizes public safety and economic development, I've added a link to the next posting for the full plan that went to the Council on March 16:
http://www.cityofventura.net/budget
I appreciate the additional commentary from Anonymous. I've written before on this blog about the increasing divide in retail -- the "experiential" kind where the setting, service and mix justify higher prices and the "cash and carry" kind that Anonymous rightly notes has continued to take market share from old-line mall merchants.
We have not abandoned pursuing future retail development -- the extension of Olivas Park Drive is designed to allow large floor-plate retailers to locate behind our current Auto Mall.
Post a Comment